Sifuna, who serves as ODM Secretary-General and Nairobi Senator, moved to the tribunal following a disagreement with the party leadership over what he terms as procedural irregularities and alleged violations of the party constitution.
While the exact details of the complaint remain partly undisclosed, sources within ODM indicate that the dispute touches on recent internal decisions that Sifuna claims were made without proper consultation or adherence to laid-down structures.
In documents filed before the tribunal, Sifuna is reportedly seeking clarification and redress on the party’s decision-making processes, arguing that key organs were sidelined in favor of unilateral actions by a section of the leadership.
He maintains that ODM, as one of Kenya’s largest political parties, must uphold transparency, accountability, and respect for its own constitution to maintain credibility among its supporters.
ODM, on its part, has dismissed the claims as misguided and premature, insisting that all its actions were within the legal and constitutional framework of the party.
Party insiders suggest that the leadership is keen to resolve the matter internally but will nonetheless respect the tribunal’s authority and ruling.
The case now places the PPDT at the center of a high stakes political contest, as it will be required to interpret party rules and determine whether due process was followed.
Also Read
Legal experts argue that the tribunal’s decision could set an important precedent for how disputes within political parties are handled, especially at a time when internal wrangles have become increasingly common across Kenya’s political landscape.
Observers note that the outcome of the case could also have political ramifications beyond ODM, particularly as the country gradually shifts focus toward future electoral contests.
Any ruling perceived as weakening party structures or leadership authority could embolden dissent within other parties, while a decision affirming strict adherence to party hierarchy might discourage internal challenges.
For Sifuna, the case is seen as both a legal and political gamble. While it positions him as a defender of institutional integrity, it also risks deepening divisions within ODM if not handled carefully.
For the party, the dispute presents a test of unity and its ability to manage internal disagreements without escalating into public fallout.
The tribunal is expected to hear preliminary submissions in the coming days, with both sides expressing confidence in their positions.
As the proceedings unfold, political watchers will be keenly observing whether the case strengthens democratic practices within parties or exposes deeper fractures in one of Kenya’s most influential political movements.
