We Will Attack Your Device: Uganda’s Chilling Warning to VPN Users Sparks Outrage
3 min read
Img 20220701 112916 479 Scaled 1
Uganda’s internet freedom debate has intensified after a hard hitting warning from Uganda Communications Commission (UCC) ICT manager Nyombi Thembo.
He cautioned citizens using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to bypass internet restrictions that they risk losing access altogether.
His remarks have ignited widespread concern among digital rights activists, technology experts and ordinary internet users.
Thembo spoke about tightened online controls. He stated that authorities are aware of individuals using VPNs. These individuals use VPNs to circumvent government imposed restrictions.
He warned that such users should not be surprised. Their devices might be attacked. They could be permanently blocked from accessing the network.
The statement has been interpreted by many as a threat of aggressive cyber countermeasures against users seeking unrestricted internet access.
VPNs are commonly used worldwide to enhance privacy, protect personal data, and access restricted content.
In Uganda, however, their use has surged during periods of political tension, elections and social unrest, when access to social media platforms and messaging services has previously been restricted.
Thembo’s warning signals a more forceful approach by regulators determined to enforce compliance with state directives.
Digital rights groups argue that the threat raises serious legal and ethical questions.
Also Read
- Ksh.5 Trillion Budget? The Ambitious Plan Behind Ruto’s Economic Vision
- Sunday Scare: Accident Hits Health CS Aden Duale’s Security Convoy in Kisumu
- Ruto Reveals the Real Deal Behind Kenya’s Broad-Based Government
- Why ODM Is Not Leaving the Broad-Based Government Anytime Soon, Oburu Oginga Explains
- Is a New Political Alliance Forming? Ruto Clarifies His Stand on ODM
Members of the public say that attacking users’ devices could amount to unlawful surveillance, cyber harassment or violations of constitutional rights to privacy and access to information.
Some technology experts have also questioned the feasibility and legality of permanently banning devices from national networks, warning that such actions could damage trust in Uganda’s digital ecosystem.
On social media, Ugandans reacted with alarm and defiance, with many questioning whether using a VPN often marketed as a cybersecurity tool should be treated as a criminal act.
Others warned that heavy handed enforcement could push users toward more sophisticated tools, escalating a digital cat and mouse game between authorities and citizens.
The government, however, maintains that internet controls are necessary for national security, public order, and combating misinformation.
Supporters of regulation argue that unrestricted VPN use undermines lawful directives and enables harmful online activities.

