By Afrireport 
Mumias East Member of Parliament Peter Salasya has launched a sharp attack on the use of State House for partisan political activities, warning that the trend undermines national unity and the moral authority of public office.
In a strongly worded statement, Salasya described it as “deeply unholy, unjust and unfair” for leaders who already enjoy immense personal privilege to appropriate a national symbol for political interests.
He argued that State House, which represents the sovereignty and unity of the Kenyan people, should remain above partisan competition and personal ambition.
Without naming individuals directly, the outspoken legislator questioned the moral basis of leaders who, despite owning multiple homes and enjoying state-funded benefits, choose to convert State House into a political arena.
He said such actions betray the spirit in which the institution was established and erode public trust in leadership.
State House is not a private residence or a party headquarters. It is a holy place and a symbol of national unity,” Salasya said, adding that its misuse sends the wrong message to citizens who expect fairness, inclusivity, and respect for public institutions.
Also Read
- Six Witnesses, One Verdict: Museveni Prepares for Legal Fight Over Poll Win
- "State House Is Not a Party Office,” Salasya Fires Warning
- Ruto Announces Tax Cut for Earnners Below Ksh50,000
- Government Plans to Tap NSSF Pension Reserves for High Return Projects
- Ruto to Meet Over 12,000 Aspirants in Early Signal of 2027 Battle
His remarks come amid growing political activity around State House, including meetings with political allies, aspirants, and delegations that critics say blur the line between official state business and party politics.
The issue has sparked debate across the political divide, with some leaders defending the engagements as routine consultations, while others argue they amount to abuse of office.
Salasya warned that normalising partisan use of State House risks deepening political divisions in an already polarised country.
He noted that Kenya’s history shows how the misuse of state institutions can fuel exclusion and resentment, particularly during election cycles.
The Mumias East MP also framed the issue as a moral and ethical question, saying leadership should be guided by restraint and respect for national symbols.
He argued that leaders must demonstrate humility and fairness, especially at a time when many Kenyans are struggling with high living costs and economic uncertainty.
They note that while the Constitution does not explicitly bar political meetings at State House, the spirit of constitutionalism calls for neutrality of key state institutions.
As the 2027 General Election approaches, the debate over the role of State House in political mobilisation is expected to intensify.
Salasya’s remarks add to mounting pressure on leaders to clearly separate state functions from partisan interests and to preserve national institutions as shared symbols for all Kenyans.
