The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission has opened investigations into alleged misuse of public funds following claims that Sh5 million was spent on a lavish housewarming party at the official residence of the Speaker of Vihiga County.
The probe comes amid mounting public pressure for accountability over county expenditures and renewed scrutiny of how devolved units manage taxpayer money.
According to sources familiar with the matter, the anti graft agency acted after receiving complaints and preliminary reports suggesting that county resources may have been used to finance the event.
The claims allege that the expenditure covered catering, décor, entertainment, security and logistics associated with the celebration, raising questions about procurement procedures and authorization of funds.
EACC officials said the investigation will seek to establish whether public money was used and, if so, whether proper approvals were obtained in line with the Public Finance Management Act and procurement laws.
Investigators are expected to examine payment vouchers, contracts and internal approvals, as well as interview county officials involved in planning and authorizing the event.
The commission will also assess whether the residence qualifies as a public facility and the extent to which public funds can lawfully be spent on such activities.
Also Read
- Sh120 Million Shock: Senate Confronts Turkana Governor Over Mega Residence Payment!
- ODM Vows to Rule Kenya in 2027 Gladys Wanga Reveals Bold Plan
- From Protesters to Power: ODM Declares Itself a Ruling Party
- Ruto Heads to Ethiopia: What Kenya Hopes to Gain at the AU Summit Will Surprise You!
- Eugene Wamalwa Invites Edwin Sifuna to Join DAP-K as ODM Rift Deepens
The controversy has sparked debate among residents and civil society groups in Vihiga, many of whom argue that counties should prioritize essential services such as healthcare, water, and infrastructure.
Critics say the alleged spending is out of touch with the economic realities facing citizens, especially at a time when counties are grappling with budget constraints and competing development needs.
County officials, however, have urged the public to await the outcome of the investigation, cautioning against speculation.
Some leaders have suggested that the event was privately funded or that the figures being circulated are exaggerated.
They maintain that all expenditures undertaken by the county follow established procedures and are subject to oversight by the County Assembly and external auditors.
The EACC has reiterated that opening an investigation does not amount to a finding of guilt.
“Our mandate is to establish facts and determine whether any laws were breached,” an official said, noting that any evidence of wrongdoing would be forwarded to the Director of Public Prosecutions for further action.
The probe adds to a growing list of corruption related inquiries involving county governments nationwide, underscoring persistent concerns over accountability in devolved units.
As the investigation unfolds, attention will remain on whether the allegations are substantiated and what consequences, if any will follow for those found culpable.


