Hate Speech Case Takes New Twist as Judge Hands Salasya Unusual Punishment

Mumias East MP Peter Salasya has issued a public apology and launched a peace focused social media campaign.

This is after a court declined to withdraw a hate speech case facing him, instead directing him to promote harmony online for 14 consecutive days.

The ruling followed an application by Salasya seeking to have the case withdrawn, arguing that he had expressed remorse and was willing to reconcile with those offended by his remarks.

However, the court ruled that the matter raised serious public interest concerns and could not be terminated at that stage.

In a bid to balance accountability with restorative justice, the magistrate ordered the legislator to conduct a structured peace campaign across his social media platforms.

Soon after the decision, Salasya took to X, Facebook, and Instagram to issue an apology, acknowledging that his previous statements may have caused division and hurt.

He said the court order had given him an opportunity to reflect and recommit himself to responsible leadership.

He urged Kenyans to reject hate speech and embrace peaceful coexistence regardless of political or ethnic differences.

As a leader, my words carry weight. I regret any harm caused and I choose peace, Salasya said in one of his posts, which carried hashtags promoting unity and national cohesion. He pledged to use the 14-day campaign to educate his followers on tolerance, respect, and the dangers of inflammatory language, particularly during politically charged periods.

Also read

• Ksh.5 Trillion Budget? The Ambitious Plan Behind Ruto’s Economic Vision
• Sunday Scare: Accident Hits Health CS Aden Duale’s Security Convoy in Kisumu
• Ruto Reveals the Real Deal Behind Kenya’s Broad-Based Government
• Why ODM Is Not Leaving the Broad-Based Government Anytime Soon, Oburu Oginga Explains
• Is a New Political Alliance Forming? Ruto Clarifies His Stand on ODM

The peace campaign is expected to be monitored, with Salasya required to demonstrate consistent messaging that aligns with the court’s directive.

Legal experts say the order reflects a growing trend where courts seek corrective measures that go beyond punishment, especially in cases involving public figures whose influence extends widely online.

Reactions to the apology have been mixed. Some supporters have welcomed the move, saying it shows maturity and growth, while critics argue that an apology should not replace full accountability under the law.

Civil society groups, meanwhile, have praised the court’s decision, noting that hate speech remains a serious threat to social cohesion.

The case will continue to be mentioned in court as Salasya carries out the peace campaign, with further directions expected after the 14 day period lapses.