By Afrireport 
The Supreme Court has lifted a long standing ban that had barred Senior Counsel Ahmednasir Abdullahi and his law firm from appearing before the apex court.
This marked ethe end of a two year standoff that stirred intense debate within Kenya’s legal fraternity.
In a decision delivered on Friday, the court allowed Ahmednasir and his firm to resume legal practice before the Supreme Court with immediate effect.
The ruling effectively reverses sanctions imposed in 2024. That was when the court barred the outspoken lawyer over remarks it deemed contemptuous. These remarks were considered undermining to the integrity of the judiciary.
The ban had sparked sharp reactions across the country. Some sections of the bar termed it excessive. They raised concerns about freedom of expression. Others defended the court’s authority to protect its dignity.
Throughout the suspension period, Ahmednasir repeatedly challenged the decision, describing it as unconstitutional and an attack on independent legal thought.
Also read
- Trump vs Trevor Noah: Epstein Joke Sparks Fresh Legal Threats
- No More Excuses! CS Ruku Warns Underperforming Civil Servants
- Inside Kakamega’s Newest ECDE Block: What Governor Barasa Just Unveiled in Matungu
- Museveni Drops Uganda Airlines CEO in Sudden Midnight Shake-Up
- How a Promised Way Out Abroad Turned Into a Growing Labour Scandal
In its latest ruling, the Supreme Court indicated that the circumstances that led to the suspension had since changed. It was in the interests of justice to allow the Senior Counsel to resume practice.
The court did not fully recant its earlier position. However, it emphasized the need to move forward. The right of litigants to be represented by advocates of their choice must be upheld.
Legal analysts say the decision could signal a thawing of relations between the bench and the bar. This is especially true amid ongoing calls for judicial reforms. There is also a push for greater tolerance of criticism.
Some observers argue the ruling sets an important precedent on proportionality in disciplining advocates, particularly senior members of the profession.
Ahmednasir, a prominent constitutional lawyer and political commentator, has yet to issue a detailed public statement following the ruling.
However, close associates say he welcomed the decision, describing it as a victory not just for himself, but for the broader legal profession.
The ruling is expected to reignite debate on the balance between judicial authority and free speech, while also restoring one of Kenya’s most visible legal voices to the country’s highest court.
