Tensions between the Senate and county leadership, Senate Speaker Amason Kingi on Tuesday dismissed requests by a group of governors seeking the removal of Senators Edwin Sifuna, Samson Cherargei, and Moses Kanjwang from a key Senate committee.
The governors, citing concerns over alleged partiality and committee mismanagement, had formally petitioned the Senate leadership to reconsider the appointments of the three lawmakers.
However, Kingi maintained that the senators were appointed in line with constitutional and parliamentary procedures and that any attempt to unseat them outside these frameworks would undermine the independence of the legislative arm.
The Senate operates under the rule of law and its committees are constituted in accordance with established procedures. Interference from external parties, including governors, cannot be entertained,” Kingi stated during a press briefing at Parliament Buildings.
Also Read
- Chaos in Wajir: Police Launch Investigation After Security Scare at Ruto Event
- Governor Wamatangi Fights Back Against Coordinated Online Political War
- Kakamega ODM: “We Stand United Despite Leadership Changes
- Warning to Leaders: Your Political Moves Could Be Creating Criminal Empires
- Drama in Senate: Speaker Blocks Governors’ Attempt to Remove Top Lawmakers
The senators in question have been active members of the committee tasked with overseeing county governance issues, a role that has occasionally put them at odds with certain governors.
Sources indicate that tensions have risen due to scrutiny over budget allocations and oversight reports that some county executives deemed unfavorable.
The rejection of the governors’ petition could set a precedent, reaffirming the autonomy of Senate committees against pressure from county leaders.
Despite the rejection, Kingi urged both senators and governors to maintain dialogue and cooperate for the benefit of county governance.
“Our goal is to strengthen accountability and transparency. While disagreements are expected, they must be resolved within the law,” he said.
The move is expected to draw reactions from both sides, with governors likely to weigh their next steps amid ongoing debates over county federal relations.
Observers note that the episode reflects broader tensions between devolved governments and Parliament over oversight and influence in county affairs.
As the political dynamics unfold, attention now turns to how the committee will continue its work and whether the affected senators will maintain their current approach in handling contentious matters involving county executives.


